After the definition of the risk’s likelihood and severity, the criticality was calculated and then the priority number was defined for all risks. To evaluate the risks, different rating benchmarks were used for each process. The risks are defined according to the 5M method and the risk process used comprised 3 phases identification, assessment and action phase.
The internal process sheets which include all the data relating to the processes were used to collect data. The samples chosen for the study were 3 processes of MULTILAB Monitoring and Measurement as a management process, Request Review as realization process and Provision of Skills as a support process. Methods: This study was performed from March to May 2018 in MULTILAB. The aim of this study is to reduce the identified risks of the 3 chosen processes in MULTILAB to ensure a complete identification of probable risks to enable then the laboratory to succeed the transition and accreditation project. This study evaluates 3 processes at MULTILAB to identify, evaluate, and control all the risks related to each process using a risk management process.
ISO 17025 2017 RISK MANAGEMENT TEMPLATE ISO
MULTILAB, which is an Agri-Food and Environmental analysis laboratory, decided in 2018 to start the project accreditation for the microbiological analysis unit according to the new version of the ISO / CEI 17025: 2017 standard. Background: Accreditation ensures a very high level of control of the risks that laboratories may face during their cycle regardless of a systemic situation, internal or external change or even in a state of crisis.
0 kommentar(er)
